This note uses our own data to map device registration in 北京市, China: how many companies, how many certificates, how the classes break down, which companies hold the most, and which overseas markets those companies reached. Data as of 2026-09-07.
Volume and rank
As of 2026-09-07 the database holds 169 companies in 北京市 with Chinese registrations or filings, 3,260 certificates in total, ranking 7 among the provincial-level areas covered. That is 19.3 certificates per company against a national average of 8.1 — above the national average, indicating a concentration of larger certificate holders.
What the class split shows
By class: 1,027 Class I filings, 1,574 Class II and 656 Class III registrations. Class II and III together are 2,230 certificates, 68% of the total, against 44% nationally.
Class I is a filing regime administered locally with a low barrier, so it dominates by count everywhere; comparing provinces on Class I volume tells you little. The share of Class II and III is the discriminating measure. 北京市 sits above the national average, which suggests a product mix weighted toward higher-risk classes and heavier registration and clinical-evaluation investment.
Companies holding the most certificates
The "Markets" column counts how many of the 14 official registries in this database return records for that company. Follow a company link to see per-market record counts, class distribution, and the similar names that were excluded during verification.
Overseas footprint
Of the 169 companies recorded in 北京市, 61 also have registrations outside China — 36%. By market: 欧盟 34, 美国 30, 巴西 21, 英国 18, 澳大利亚 18, 台湾 17.
Read that share with care: the Chinese side groups by company name and the overseas side verifies manufacturer names record by record. Where the two spellings differ the link fails, so "not found" does not mean "does not exist".
Product focus
By main product terms, 北京市 concentrates in 一次性使用电圈套器, 多普勒外周血管检测仪, 富血小板血浆制备器, 人体成分分析仪, 毫米波治疗仪, 无菌敷贴, 纱布片, 医用防护口罩.
How to read these numbers
Every market figure on this site is the result of **re-checking each manufacturer name record by record**, not a raw hit count from a registry search interface. Name search in these registries is generally a substring match: searching EUDAMED for "Edan" returns 1,933 records, of which 434 belong to HANEDAN in Turkey and 300 to TeDan Surgical in the United States — taking the raw count would overstate by more than 60 percent. We therefore require the distinctive token to appear as a whole word and demand a genuinely distinguishing shared token; generic words such as "medical" or "systems" never qualify on their own, and the similar names that were excluded are listed on each company page. Chinese data comes from NMPA public registration and filing records grouped by company name; filings map to Class I, provincial approvals to Class II and national approvals to Class III. Each market counts a different unit (the EU counts UDI-DI device records, the US counts listed device types, Canada and Brazil count valid registrations, Korea counts quality-system certifications), so figures cannot be summed or compared across markets. The full basis, official portals and query paths are at the methodology page.
Related
Related: All Chinese companies · Browse by market · Browse by category · Methodology and official query paths.
This database; Chinese figures from NMPA public registration and filing data