One question: how many Chinese manufacturers in this database hold registrations in Canada, how many each, where they are based, and what limits apply to these figures. Data as of 2026-09-07.

Scale and share

In Canada the database finds 4,711 companies with records. 238 are from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Macau (5%), holding 2,778 active device licences, an average of 11.7 each.

Of those 238 companies, 124 also hold records in five or more markets (52%), which says that a substantial part of the Chinese cohort entering Canada is pursuing a multi-market strategy rather than a single market.

Registered at home as well

Of those 238 companies, 44 also have a Chinese registration or filing in this database (18%).

A share below 100%% has two distinct explanations. Either the company is export-oriented and genuinely holds no domestic registration, or the Chinese side of this database groups by company name and a different spelling — an abbreviation, bracketed suffix or former name — fails to match. The second is a limitation of our data and is not evidence that a company lacks domestic registration.

Chinese companies with the most records

Companyactive device licencesChina registrations
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Limited2511
Shenzhen Biocare Bio-Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.23519
Becton Dickinson Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Suzhou2070
BECKMAN COULTER BIOTECHNOLOGY (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.1700
BECKMAN COULTER LABORATORY SYSTEMS (SUZHOU) CO., LTD.1700
GE HealthCare1040
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Suzhou) Instruments Co., Ltd930
Roche Diagnostics (Suzhou) Ltd.880
HOLOGIC820
ICU Medical620
Carestream Health500
KIMBERLY-CLARK PERSONAL HYGIENIC PRODUCTS, LTD.480

Scope and limits

Canada counts active device licences.

Every market figure on this site is the result of **re-checking each manufacturer name record by record**, not a raw hit count from a registry search interface. Name search in these registries is generally a substring match: searching EUDAMED for "Edan" returns 1,933 records, of which 434 belong to HANEDAN in Turkey and 300 to TeDan Surgical in the United States — taking the raw count would overstate by more than 60 percent. We therefore require the distinctive token to appear as a whole word and demand a genuinely distinguishing shared token; generic words such as "medical" or "systems" never qualify on their own, and the similar names that were excluded are listed on each company page. Each market counts a different unit (the EU counts UDI-DI device records, the US counts listed device types, Canada and Brazil count valid registrations, Korea counts quality-system certifications), so figures cannot be summed or compared across markets. The full basis, official portals and query paths are at the methodology page.

Related

Related: All markets side by side · Chinese companies · Browse by category · Methodology.

This database; source data from Health Canada MDALL