One question: how many Chinese manufacturers in this database hold registrations in Taiwan, how many each, where they are based, and what limits apply to these figures. Data as of 2026-09-07.

Scale and share

In Taiwan the database finds 4,475 companies with records. 799 are from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Macau (18%), holding 2,846 valid device licences, an average of 3.6 each.

Of those 799 companies, 444 also hold records in five or more markets (56%), which says that a substantial part of the Chinese cohort entering Taiwan is pursuing a multi-market strategy rather than a single market.

Registered at home as well

Of those 799 companies, 280 also have a Chinese registration or filing in this database (35%).

A share below 100%% has two distinct explanations. Either the company is export-oriented and genuinely holds no domestic registration, or the Chinese side of this database groups by company name and a different spelling — an abbreviation, bracketed suffix or former name — fails to match. The second is a limitation of our data and is not evidence that a company lacks domestic registration.

Chinese companies with the most records

Companyvalid device licencesChina registrations
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Limited1091
Siemens Healthineers Ltd.5932
SteriLance Medical (Suzhou) Inc.4626
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (Guangzhou) Ltd.420
ICU Medical400
Shandong Lianfa Medical Plastic Products Co., Ltd.384
HOLOGIC360
GE HealthCare330
ONBO ELECTRONIC (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD.330
APT Medical320
Hubei Qianjiang Kingphar Medical Material Co., Ltd.2840
BEIJING RUICHENG MEDICAL SUPPLIES CO., LTD.240

Scope and limits

Taiwan counts valid device licences.

Every market figure on this site is the result of **re-checking each manufacturer name record by record**, not a raw hit count from a registry search interface. Name search in these registries is generally a substring match: searching EUDAMED for "Edan" returns 1,933 records, of which 434 belong to HANEDAN in Turkey and 300 to TeDan Surgical in the United States — taking the raw count would overstate by more than 60 percent. We therefore require the distinctive token to appear as a whole word and demand a genuinely distinguishing shared token; generic words such as "medical" or "systems" never qualify on their own, and the similar names that were excluded are listed on each company page. Each market counts a different unit (the EU counts UDI-DI device records, the US counts listed device types, Canada and Brazil count valid registrations, Korea counts quality-system certifications), so figures cannot be summed or compared across markets. The full basis, official portals and query paths are at the methodology page.

Related

Related: All markets side by side · Chinese companies · Browse by category · Methodology.

This database; source data from TFDA