One question: how many Chinese manufacturers in this database hold registrations in Singapore, how many each, where they are based, and what limits apply to these figures. Data as of 2026-09-07.

Scale and share

In Singapore the database finds 2,754 companies with records. 386 are from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Macau (14%), holding 1,645 device registrations, an average of 4.3 each.

Of those 386 companies, 302 also hold records in five or more markets (78%), which says that a substantial part of the Chinese cohort entering Singapore is pursuing a multi-market strategy rather than a single market.

Registered at home as well

Of those 386 companies, 126 also have a Chinese registration or filing in this database (33%).

A share below 100%% has two distinct explanations. Either the company is export-oriented and genuinely holds no domestic registration, or the Chinese side of this database groups by company name and a different spelling — an abbreviation, bracketed suffix or former name — fails to match. The second is a limitation of our data and is not evidence that a company lacks domestic registration.

Chinese companies with the most records

Companydevice registrationsChina registrations
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Limited1521
GE HealthCare760
ICU Medical600
OMRON HEALTHCARE (CHINA) CO., LTD.503
Intersurgical359
UNITED IMAGING33115
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.33892
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CHINA) CO., LTD.330
JIANGSU YUYUE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY CO.,LTD.3177
Stryker300
BMC Medical Co., Ltd.300
HOLOGIC270

Scope and limits

Singapore counts device registrations.

Every market figure on this site is the result of **re-checking each manufacturer name record by record**, not a raw hit count from a registry search interface. Name search in these registries is generally a substring match: searching EUDAMED for "Edan" returns 1,933 records, of which 434 belong to HANEDAN in Turkey and 300 to TeDan Surgical in the United States — taking the raw count would overstate by more than 60 percent. We therefore require the distinctive token to appear as a whole word and demand a genuinely distinguishing shared token; generic words such as "medical" or "systems" never qualify on their own, and the similar names that were excluded are listed on each company page. Each market counts a different unit (the EU counts UDI-DI device records, the US counts listed device types, Canada and Brazil count valid registrations, Korea counts quality-system certifications), so figures cannot be summed or compared across markets. The full basis, official portals and query paths are at the methodology page.

Related

Related: All markets side by side · Chinese companies · Browse by category · Methodology.

This database; source data from HSA SMDR