One question: how many Chinese manufacturers in this database hold registrations in Russia, how many each, where they are based, and what limits apply to these figures. Data as of 2026-09-07.

Scale and share

In Russia the database finds 3,390 companies with records. 741 are from mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan or Macau (22%), holding 3,416 active registrations, an average of 4.6 each.

Of those 741 companies, 474 also hold records in five or more markets (64%), which says that a substantial part of the Chinese cohort entering Russia is pursuing a multi-market strategy rather than a single market.

Registered at home as well

Of those 741 companies, 311 also have a Chinese registration or filing in this database (42%).

A share below 100%% has two distinct explanations. Either the company is export-oriented and genuinely holds no domestic registration, or the Chinese side of this database groups by company name and a different spelling — an abbreviation, bracketed suffix or former name — fails to match. The second is a limitation of our data and is not evidence that a company lacks domestic registration.

Chinese companies with the most records

Companyactive registrationsChina registrations
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.359892
Snibe106494
Shenzhen Lifotronic Technology Co., Ltd.1040
Autobio Diagnostics Co., Ltd.980
Shenzhen New Industries Biomedical Engineering Co., Ltd.770
URIT MEDICAL ELECTRONIC CO.,LTD.720
Dirui Industrial Co., Ltd.650
Shenzhen Dymind Biotechnology Co.,Ltd.650
ZYBIO INC.450
Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd.390
Maccura Biotechnology Co., Ltd.37496
Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd3378

Scope and limits

Russia counts active registrations.

Every market figure on this site is the result of **re-checking each manufacturer name record by record**, not a raw hit count from a registry search interface. Name search in these registries is generally a substring match: searching EUDAMED for "Edan" returns 1,933 records, of which 434 belong to HANEDAN in Turkey and 300 to TeDan Surgical in the United States — taking the raw count would overstate by more than 60 percent. We therefore require the distinctive token to appear as a whole word and demand a genuinely distinguishing shared token; generic words such as "medical" or "systems" never qualify on their own, and the similar names that were excluded are listed on each company page. Each market counts a different unit (the EU counts UDI-DI device records, the US counts listed device types, Canada and Brazil count valid registrations, Korea counts quality-system certifications), so figures cannot be summed or compared across markets. The full basis, official portals and query paths are at the methodology page.

Related

Related: All markets side by side · Chinese companies · Browse by category · Methodology.

This database; source data from Roszdravnadzor